MagicX XU Mini M vs PowKiddy V90S: size comparison

The MagicX XU Mini M is 40 mm wider, 21 mm shorter, 7.5 mm thinner than the PowKiddy V90S, with a front footprint about 9% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 3.5″.

MagicX XU Mini MPowKiddy V90S
PowKiddy V90S: 89 × 85 × 26.5 mm closed; open with the lid unfolded flatPowKiddy V90S: 89 × 85 × 26.5 mm closed; open with the lid unfolded flatMagicX XU Mini M: 129 × 64 × 19 mmPowKiddy V90S: 26.5 mm body, about 26.5 mm with sticks and gripsMagicX XU Mini M: 15.6 mm body, about 25 mm with sticks and grips, sticks about 6 mmSide view from below, with sticks and grips
SpecMagicX XU Mini MPowKiddy V90S
Width129 mm (5.08″)89 mm (3.50″)
Height64 mm (2.52″)85 mm (3.35″), closed
Thickness19 mm (0.75″)26.5 mm (1.04″)
With sticks & grips≈ 25 mm (0.98″)≈ 26.5 mm (1.04″)
Weight120 g (4.2 oz)Unknown
Screen2.8″3.5″
PanelLCDLCD
TouchscreenNoNo
Released20242025
OSLinuxLinux
ChipRockChip RK3326Allwinner A133 Plus
Launch price––
Buy
Amazon
Amazon

More MagicX XU Mini M comparisons

More PowKiddy V90S comparisons