Anbernic RG SP vs MagicX XU Mini M: size comparison
The MagicX XU Mini M is 46 mm wider, 18 mm shorter, 5 mm thinner, 48 g lighter than the Anbernic RG SP, with a front footprint about 21% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 3.4″.
The MagicX XU Mini M is 46 mm wider, 18 mm shorter, 5 mm thinner, 48 g lighter than the Anbernic RG SP, with a front footprint about 21% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 3.4″.