Anbernic RG NANO vs MagicX XU20 V32: size comparison
The MagicX XU20 V32 is 40 mm wider, 41 mm taller, 7 mm thicker, 85 g heavier than the Anbernic RG NANO, with a front footprint about 204% larger. Screens: 3.2″ vs 1.54″.
The MagicX XU20 V32 is 40 mm wider, 41 mm taller, 7 mm thicker, 85 g heavier than the Anbernic RG NANO, with a front footprint about 204% larger. Screens: 3.2″ vs 1.54″.