Anbernic RG NANO vs MagicX XU Mini M: size comparison
The MagicX XU Mini M is 86 mm wider, 7 mm shorter, 2 mm thicker, 45 g heavier than the Anbernic RG NANO, with a front footprint about 170% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 1.54″.
The MagicX XU Mini M is 86 mm wider, 7 mm shorter, 2 mm thicker, 45 g heavier than the Anbernic RG NANO, with a front footprint about 170% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 1.54″.