Anbernic RG-34XXSP vs MagicX XU Mini M: size comparison
The MagicX XU Mini M is 47 mm wider, 19 mm shorter, 6 mm thinner, 58 g lighter than the Anbernic RG-34XXSP, with a front footprint about 21% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 3.4″.
The MagicX XU Mini M is 47 mm wider, 19 mm shorter, 6 mm thinner, 58 g lighter than the Anbernic RG-34XXSP, with a front footprint about 21% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 3.4″.