Anbernic RG-28XX vs MagicX XU Mini M: size comparison
The MagicX XU Mini M is 4 mm wider, 7.5 mm taller, 2.5 mm thicker, 3 g lighter than the Anbernic RG-28XX, with a front footprint about 17% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 2.83″.
The MagicX XU Mini M is 4 mm wider, 7.5 mm taller, 2.5 mm thicker, 3 g lighter than the Anbernic RG-28XX, with a front footprint about 17% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 2.83″.