Anbernic RG-280V vs MagicX XU Mini M: size comparison
The MagicX XU Mini M is 51 mm wider, 25 mm shorter, 1 mm thicker, 5 g lighter than the Anbernic RG-280V, with a front footprint about 19% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 2.8″.
The MagicX XU Mini M is 51 mm wider, 25 mm shorter, 1 mm thicker, 5 g lighter than the Anbernic RG-280V, with a front footprint about 19% larger. Screens: 2.8″ vs 2.8″.